• AI-Generated Content & Originality: Where SEO Guidelines Draw the Line
    AI-generated content has moved from novelty to normal in record time. What once felt experimental is now embedded in daily workflows across SEO, content marketing, and digital marketing teams. Blogs, product descriptions, outlines, and even long-form articles are increasingly created with AI assistance.
    But as adoption rises, so does confusion.
    Is AI-generated content allowed by search engines?
    Where does originality fit in?
    And at what point does automation cross the line into risk?
    The truth is not black and white. SEO guidelines don’t ban AI-generated content—but they do draw a clear line around quality, intent, and originality. Understanding where that line sits is critical for brands that want to scale content without sacrificing rankings or trust.
    How Search Engines Actually View AI-Generated Content
    Contrary to popular belief, search engines do not penalize content simply because AI helped create it. What they evaluate is the outcome, not the tool.
    From an SEO perspective, search engines care about:
    Usefulness


    Accuracy


    Original value


    User satisfaction


    Content intent


    If AI-generated content meets these standards, it can rank. If it doesn’t, it won’t—regardless of whether a human or machine wrote it.
    This shift reflects how modern algorithms work. They are increasingly focused on experience signals, semantic depth, and intent matching rather than authorship.
    Where Originality Fits Into Modern SEO
    Originality in SEO does not mean “never using AI.” It means creating content that adds distinct value.
    Search engines define originality through:
    Unique insights or perspectives


    Fresh organization of information


    Contextual relevance to a specific audience


    Depth beyond surface-level summaries


    AI tools are excellent at generating baseline content. But baseline content alone rarely ranks in competitive spaces.
    Originality emerges when AI output is:
    Edited for clarity and accuracy


    Enriched with examples or experience


    Structured for user intent


    Refined with domain knowledge


    This is where human oversight becomes essential.
    The Line SEO Guidelines Draw (And Why It Matters)
    SEO guidelines draw the line at manipulation, not automation.
    Problems arise when AI-generated content is used to:
    Mass-produce low-quality pages


    Target keywords without real intent


    Mimic originality without adding value


    Flood search results with redundant information


    These practices fall under what search engines classify as scaled content abuse. The issue isn’t AI—it’s misuse.
    In contrast, AI-assisted content that is reviewed, improved, and aligned with user needs fits well within SEO best practices.
    AI SEO: Enhancement, Not Replacement
    In AI SEO workflows, the most successful teams use AI as a co-pilot, not an autopilot.
    AI excels at:
    Speeding up research


    Generating outlines


    Identifying content gaps


    Improving consistency


    Supporting content ideation


    Humans excel at:
    Judgment


    Context


    Strategy


    Experience-based insights


    Ethical decision-making


    When these strengths combine, content becomes both scalable and original.
    Examples of AI Content That Performs Well in SEO
    Consider a SaaS company that publishes blog content for mid-funnel buyers. Instead of publishing raw AI-generated articles, the team:
    Uses AI to create structured drafts


    Adds real product examples


    Includes industry-specific use cases


    Refines tone for their audience


    Updates content based on performance data


    The result is content that ranks because it solves a problem, not because it fills a keyword quota.
    This approach aligns perfectly with SEO guidelines and avoids the risks associated with low-effort automation.
    Common Mistakes That Cross the Line
    Many SEO issues with AI content come from shortcuts.
    Some common red flags include:
    Publishing AI output without editing


    Repeating the same structure across dozens of pages


    Overusing keywords unnaturally


    Ignoring factual accuracy


    Creating content with no clear audience


    These patterns are easy for search engines to detect—not because they are “AI-written,” but because they lack intent and quality.
    How Search Engines Detect Low-Quality AI Content
    Search engines don’t rely on simple “AI detectors.” Instead, they evaluate patterns.
    Signals include:
    High bounce rates


    Low engagement


    Thin topical coverage


    Repetitive phrasing


    Poor semantic depth


    If users don’t find content helpful, rankings decline. This holds true whether content is human-written or AI-assisted.
    In digital marketing, performance metrics remain the ultimate filter.
    How to Use AI Content Safely for SEO
    To stay within SEO guidelines, focus on process—not just output.
    Best practices include:
    Treat AI drafts as first versions


    Add expert input or real-world examples


    Fact-check thoroughly


    Match content to specific search intent


    Optimize readability and structure


    Avoid mass publishing without review


    This approach ensures originality comes from intent and refinement, not just wording.
    Originality Is About Value, Not Just Uniqueness
    One of the biggest misconceptions in SEO is that originality equals never-before-seen information.
    In reality, originality often means:
    Explaining familiar topics more clearly


    Applying ideas to a new audience


    Combining insights in a useful way


    Updating outdated perspectives


    AI can help assemble information—but originality emerges when humans shape it with purpose.
    The Future of AI-Generated Content in SEO
    AI-generated content isn’t going away. It’s becoming part of the standard toolkit.
    As search engines grow more sophisticated, they will continue rewarding:
    Clarity over volume


    Intent over automation


    Usefulness over novelty


    Brands that understand this balance will thrive. Those chasing shortcuts will struggle.
    Conclusion
    AI-generated content and originality are not opposites—they work best together when guided by clear intent and strong editorial standards. SEO guidelines draw the line at manipulation, not innovation. When used responsibly, AI can support scalable, high-quality content that serves both users and search engines. Grow your business through SEO with proven strategies.
    This content is written with the help of AI tools and researched using AI. After writing, SEO experts of SERP Monsters have optimized this content for clarity, relevance, and search engine performance.
    https://serpmonsters.com/

    AI-Generated Content & Originality: Where SEO Guidelines Draw the Line AI-generated content has moved from novelty to normal in record time. What once felt experimental is now embedded in daily workflows across SEO, content marketing, and digital marketing teams. Blogs, product descriptions, outlines, and even long-form articles are increasingly created with AI assistance. But as adoption rises, so does confusion. Is AI-generated content allowed by search engines? Where does originality fit in? And at what point does automation cross the line into risk? The truth is not black and white. SEO guidelines don’t ban AI-generated content—but they do draw a clear line around quality, intent, and originality. Understanding where that line sits is critical for brands that want to scale content without sacrificing rankings or trust. How Search Engines Actually View AI-Generated Content Contrary to popular belief, search engines do not penalize content simply because AI helped create it. What they evaluate is the outcome, not the tool. From an SEO perspective, search engines care about: Usefulness Accuracy Original value User satisfaction Content intent If AI-generated content meets these standards, it can rank. If it doesn’t, it won’t—regardless of whether a human or machine wrote it. This shift reflects how modern algorithms work. They are increasingly focused on experience signals, semantic depth, and intent matching rather than authorship. Where Originality Fits Into Modern SEO Originality in SEO does not mean “never using AI.” It means creating content that adds distinct value. Search engines define originality through: Unique insights or perspectives Fresh organization of information Contextual relevance to a specific audience Depth beyond surface-level summaries AI tools are excellent at generating baseline content. But baseline content alone rarely ranks in competitive spaces. Originality emerges when AI output is: Edited for clarity and accuracy Enriched with examples or experience Structured for user intent Refined with domain knowledge This is where human oversight becomes essential. The Line SEO Guidelines Draw (And Why It Matters) SEO guidelines draw the line at manipulation, not automation. Problems arise when AI-generated content is used to: Mass-produce low-quality pages Target keywords without real intent Mimic originality without adding value Flood search results with redundant information These practices fall under what search engines classify as scaled content abuse. The issue isn’t AI—it’s misuse. In contrast, AI-assisted content that is reviewed, improved, and aligned with user needs fits well within SEO best practices. AI SEO: Enhancement, Not Replacement In AI SEO workflows, the most successful teams use AI as a co-pilot, not an autopilot. AI excels at: Speeding up research Generating outlines Identifying content gaps Improving consistency Supporting content ideation Humans excel at: Judgment Context Strategy Experience-based insights Ethical decision-making When these strengths combine, content becomes both scalable and original. Examples of AI Content That Performs Well in SEO Consider a SaaS company that publishes blog content for mid-funnel buyers. Instead of publishing raw AI-generated articles, the team: Uses AI to create structured drafts Adds real product examples Includes industry-specific use cases Refines tone for their audience Updates content based on performance data The result is content that ranks because it solves a problem, not because it fills a keyword quota. This approach aligns perfectly with SEO guidelines and avoids the risks associated with low-effort automation. Common Mistakes That Cross the Line Many SEO issues with AI content come from shortcuts. Some common red flags include: Publishing AI output without editing Repeating the same structure across dozens of pages Overusing keywords unnaturally Ignoring factual accuracy Creating content with no clear audience These patterns are easy for search engines to detect—not because they are “AI-written,” but because they lack intent and quality. How Search Engines Detect Low-Quality AI Content Search engines don’t rely on simple “AI detectors.” Instead, they evaluate patterns. Signals include: High bounce rates Low engagement Thin topical coverage Repetitive phrasing Poor semantic depth If users don’t find content helpful, rankings decline. This holds true whether content is human-written or AI-assisted. In digital marketing, performance metrics remain the ultimate filter. How to Use AI Content Safely for SEO To stay within SEO guidelines, focus on process—not just output. Best practices include: Treat AI drafts as first versions Add expert input or real-world examples Fact-check thoroughly Match content to specific search intent Optimize readability and structure Avoid mass publishing without review This approach ensures originality comes from intent and refinement, not just wording. Originality Is About Value, Not Just Uniqueness One of the biggest misconceptions in SEO is that originality equals never-before-seen information. In reality, originality often means: Explaining familiar topics more clearly Applying ideas to a new audience Combining insights in a useful way Updating outdated perspectives AI can help assemble information—but originality emerges when humans shape it with purpose. The Future of AI-Generated Content in SEO AI-generated content isn’t going away. It’s becoming part of the standard toolkit. As search engines grow more sophisticated, they will continue rewarding: Clarity over volume Intent over automation Usefulness over novelty Brands that understand this balance will thrive. Those chasing shortcuts will struggle. Conclusion AI-generated content and originality are not opposites—they work best together when guided by clear intent and strong editorial standards. SEO guidelines draw the line at manipulation, not innovation. When used responsibly, AI can support scalable, high-quality content that serves both users and search engines. Grow your business through SEO with proven strategies. This content is written with the help of AI tools and researched using AI. After writing, SEO experts of SERP Monsters have optimized this content for clarity, relevance, and search engine performance. https://serpmonsters.com/
    SERPMONSTERS.COM
    Home
    Get Affordable & AI-powered SEO Services in India from SERP Monsters SEO Company in India. Providing Result Driven Google Rank & Promotion Services.
    0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 81 Visualizzazioni
  • GPT Plagiarism Checker

    Use GPT Plagiarism Checker to detect AI-generated content and ensure your writing is original and free from ChatGPT-based plagiarism.

    Click Here for More Info:- https://www.zerogpt.com
    GPT Plagiarism Checker Use GPT Plagiarism Checker to detect AI-generated content and ensure your writing is original and free from ChatGPT-based plagiarism. Click Here for More Info:- https://www.zerogpt.com
    0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 2K Visualizzazioni
  • Qəp̄îṣáṯ hadDéreḫ, [11/04/2024 17:21]
    I CONTENUTI DI INTERNET VERRANNO SOSTITUITI DALL'IA

    Motori che fanno la ricerca al posto tuo, bot che fanno propaganda politica e influencer virtuali stanno peggiorando radicalmente internet.

    1) I MOTORI DI RICERCA DIVENTANO MACCHINE DELLE RISPOSTE

    Come ho già spiegato (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia/911) riguardo all'IA di Bing (https://blogs.bing.com/search/may_2023/Announcing-the-Next-Wave-of-AI-Innovation-with-Microsoft-Bing-and-Edge), anche Google tramite il suo Gemini (https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini-ai/) (facente uso di Deep Mind (https://www.ai4business.it/intelligenza-artificiale/deepmind-cose-storia-programmi-e-software/)) sta cercando di sviluppare una sorta di macchina delle risposte che possa andare a sostituire i classici risultati testuali sottoforma di link.
    La beta (https://blog.google/products/search/generative-ai-search/) di Google usa materiale da diversi siti per generare risultati generati artificialmente, così che in futuro gli utenti non visiteranno più siti web, ma si limiteranno ad ottenere risposte, utilizzando una soluzione "zero-click (https://www.insightpartners.com/ideas/generative-ai-seo-zero-click-searches/)". Questo significa che gli utenti di internet non disposti a fare ricerche si interfacceranno con le risposte proposte dalla macchina costruite in base ai bias (https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08836) imposti dai loro programmatori e non si interfacceranno più con contenuti prodotti da esseri umani, inoltre le persone ridurranno (https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-and-the-rise-of-zero-click-searches-what-does-it-mean-for-your-business-podcast/474281/) il numero di click sui siti, o si fermeranno solo a quelli consigliati dall'IA nella sitografia, portando ad una riduzione generale delle visite.

    2) L'IA SOSTITUISCE L'UOMO ANCHE SUI SOCIAL

    I contenuti (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370001090_AI-Generated_Content_AIGC_A_Survey) degli utenti stanno venendo sempre più sostituiti (https://www.wired.it/article/internet-morta-teoria-complotto-realta-intelligenza-artificiale/) dai contenuti generati artificialmente, soprattutto sui social network, dove i contenuti più ripetuti sono solitamente anche quelli più monetizzati, poiché vanno ad agire su un pubblico più vasto (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444809341264).
    Esistono poi le IA content farm (https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/06/27/1075545/next-gen-content-farms-ai-generated-text-ads/) che sono server dedicati alla creazione di contenuti (https://web.archive.org/web/20230613194814/https://gamurs.breezy.hr/p/3a291acf07ac-ai-editor) da rilasciare automaticamente su vari canali di comunicazione.
    Alcuni utenti di Wikipedia (https://blog.datawrapper.de/wikipedia-articles-written-by-a-bot/) dicono di utilizzare le IA per effettuare le traduzioni, che spesso risultano essere imprecise (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y) o polarizzate (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0267323120940908), introducendo termini della neolingua (https://scitechdaily.com/chatgpts-strong-left-wing-political-bias-unmasked-by-new-study/) gender.
    Amazon (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/20/amazon-restricts-authors-from-self-publishing-more-than-three-books-a-day-after-ai-concerns) è stato costretto dagli utenti che mettevano sul mercato libri generati artificialmente tramite IA a limitare la pubblicazione a soli 3 libri al giorno.
    X (https://postwise.ai/blog/ai-tweet-generators-comparison) (Twitter (https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tutorials/how-to-create-a-twitter-bot-with-twitter-api-v2)) alla stregua degli altri social media come Facebook (https://www.socialpilot.co/facebook-post-generator), YouTube (https://vidiq.com/generate/) e TikTok (https://www.veed.io/tools/ai-video/tiktok-video-generator) dispone di automatismi a pagamento e gratuiti, ma solitamente con registrazione, che consentono di generare (https://proofed.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-ai-generated-content/) e pubblicare (https://narrato.io/blog/publishing-automation-pillar-post-how-to-speed-up-content-publishing-with-publishing-automation/) a cadenza temporale scelta un determinato tipo di contenuti anche personalizzabili.

    3) LA DEAD INTERNET THEORY

    Presso questo (https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php?threads/dead-internet-theory-most-of-the-internet-is-fake.3011/) forum è stata teorizzata la "Dead Internet Theory (https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2024/01/16/the-dead-internet-theory-explained/)" che sostiene che la maggior parte dei contenuti presenti su internet sia fasulla, polarizzata (https://www.agendadigitale.eu/sicurezza/privacy/la-profilazione-social-influenza-le-scelte-elettorali-come-funziona-e-quali-difese/) e manipolata.
    Le IA giocano un ruolo cruciale in questo processo e propagandano online contenuti attraverso una ripetizione (https://www.andreaminini.com/comunicazione/la-ripetizione-nella-comunicazione-online) meccanica e distribuita (https://meetedgar.com/blog/repeating-social-media-content/) su più canali.
    Quanto accade non solo influisce sulla diversità e sull'autenticità dei contenuti, ma va ad intaccare anche le scelte prese tramite mera esposizione (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia/933) e framing (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia/729), favorendo pertanto contenuti solitamente affini a quelli sostenuti dai sistemi di monetizzazione (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-social-media-makes-us-more-polarized-and-how-to-fix-it/) e impedendo agli altri di diffondersi.
    Come riportato da alcuni siti web, la notizia viene presentata come una "teoria del complotto" (1 (https://en.wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/Dead_Internet_theory), 2 (https://lifebonder.com/blog/2022/10/11/the-dead-internet-theory/), 3 (https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2024/02/09/internet-sta-per-morire-la-teoria-complottista-dead-internet-theory-torna-a-circolare-sui-social-ecco-perche-ha-un-fondo-di-verita/7440254/), 4 (https://brainlenses.substack.com/p/dead-internet-theory), 5 (https://www.crypto.it/2023/04/15/dead-internet-theory/)) ma i fatti dimostrano il contrario: la mole di contenuti generati artificialmente sta dilagando ovunque, dai siti web per le aziende (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361076492_User-Generated_Content_and_Consumer_Brand_Engagement), ai blog (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047287517746014), agli articoli (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2016.1189840) giornalistici (https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4962), ai social media (1 (https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/08/dead-internet-theory-wrong-but-feels-true/619937/), 2 (https://thedeadinternettheory.com/), 3 (https://www.theswaddle.com/what-the-dead-internet-theory-predicted-about-the-future-of-digital-life)), questo perché portano ad un risparmio economico, soprattutto per le aziende (1 (https://www.hbritalia.it/settembre-2023/2023/09/01/news/il-potenziale-economico-dellia-generativa-e-le-nuove-frontiere-della-produttivita-15641/), 2 (https://www.partitaiva.it/intelligenza-artificiale-generativa/), 3 (https://www.aiopenmind.it/ArtificialIntelligence/il-potenziale-economico-dellia-generativa-la-prossima-frontiera-della-produttivita/)).
    È stato dedicato anche un articolo accademico (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-023-01857-0) alla teoria dove si sostiene che l'IA non viene più usata solo per creare contenuti, ma per creare gli stessi influencer con lo scopo di rendere i giovani dipendenti da internet. Anche in Italia si diffonde questo fenomeno, con diverse influencer e "modelle" completamente virtuali (1 (https://www.castellinotizie.it/2024/04/04/in-visita-a-nemi-linfluencer-virtuale-francesca-giubelli-creata-dallintelligenza-artificiale-che-splendore-i-piccoli-borghi-del-territorio/), 2 (https://www.wired.it/article/prima-ai-influencer-italiana-rebecca-galani/), 3 (https://www.ilmattino.it/lifestyle/persone/emily_pellegrini_modella_finta_foto_oggi_4_1_2024-7851960.html), 4 (https://www.amica.it/2023/11/29/aiatana-lopez-modella-influencer-generata-intelligenza-artificiale/), 5 (https://www.wired.it/article/milla-sofia-influencer-virtuale-instagram-foto-intelligenza-artificiale/)), ma in realtà sono molti altri questi personaggi artificiali sul web che si spacciano per utenti reali. L'IA italiana "Francesca Giubelli" ha addirittura fondato un partito politico fittizio per promuovere l'intelligenza artificiale (1 (https://www.wired.it/article/francesca-giubelli-influencer-virtuale-partito/), 2 (https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2024/02/16/news/francesca_giubelli_partito_alleanza_nazionale_influencer_sovranista_intelligenza_artificiale-422149870/), 3 (https://roma.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/24_febbraio_01/l-influencer-artificiale-francesca-giubelli-lancia-un-partito-politico-alleanza-italiana-promuovera-la-bellezza-italiana-nel-mondo-28a933df-dce6-4ef0-8b2f-41891f868xlk.shtml), 4 (https://ainews.it/linfluencer-creata-con-lai-lancia-un-partito-ecco-alleanza-italiana/)).

    CONCLUSIONI

    Internet sta diventando un ostacolo a se stesso e sempre più isolante, chiudendo le persone in recinti di bot che si fingono esseri umani.

    Iscriviti a Der Einzige
    👉🏻 CLICCA QUI (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia) 👈🏻
    Qəp̄îṣáṯ hadDéreḫ, [11/04/2024 17:21] I CONTENUTI DI INTERNET VERRANNO SOSTITUITI DALL'IA Motori che fanno la ricerca al posto tuo, bot che fanno propaganda politica e influencer virtuali stanno peggiorando radicalmente internet. 1) I MOTORI DI RICERCA DIVENTANO MACCHINE DELLE RISPOSTE Come ho già spiegato (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia/911) riguardo all'IA di Bing (https://blogs.bing.com/search/may_2023/Announcing-the-Next-Wave-of-AI-Innovation-with-Microsoft-Bing-and-Edge), anche Google tramite il suo Gemini (https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini-ai/) (facente uso di Deep Mind (https://www.ai4business.it/intelligenza-artificiale/deepmind-cose-storia-programmi-e-software/)) sta cercando di sviluppare una sorta di macchina delle risposte che possa andare a sostituire i classici risultati testuali sottoforma di link. La beta (https://blog.google/products/search/generative-ai-search/) di Google usa materiale da diversi siti per generare risultati generati artificialmente, così che in futuro gli utenti non visiteranno più siti web, ma si limiteranno ad ottenere risposte, utilizzando una soluzione "zero-click (https://www.insightpartners.com/ideas/generative-ai-seo-zero-click-searches/)". Questo significa che gli utenti di internet non disposti a fare ricerche si interfacceranno con le risposte proposte dalla macchina costruite in base ai bias (https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.08836) imposti dai loro programmatori e non si interfacceranno più con contenuti prodotti da esseri umani, inoltre le persone ridurranno (https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-and-the-rise-of-zero-click-searches-what-does-it-mean-for-your-business-podcast/474281/) il numero di click sui siti, o si fermeranno solo a quelli consigliati dall'IA nella sitografia, portando ad una riduzione generale delle visite. 2) L'IA SOSTITUISCE L'UOMO ANCHE SUI SOCIAL I contenuti (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370001090_AI-Generated_Content_AIGC_A_Survey) degli utenti stanno venendo sempre più sostituiti (https://www.wired.it/article/internet-morta-teoria-complotto-realta-intelligenza-artificiale/) dai contenuti generati artificialmente, soprattutto sui social network, dove i contenuti più ripetuti sono solitamente anche quelli più monetizzati, poiché vanno ad agire su un pubblico più vasto (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444809341264). Esistono poi le IA content farm (https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/06/27/1075545/next-gen-content-farms-ai-generated-text-ads/) che sono server dedicati alla creazione di contenuti (https://web.archive.org/web/20230613194814/https://gamurs.breezy.hr/p/3a291acf07ac-ai-editor) da rilasciare automaticamente su vari canali di comunicazione. Alcuni utenti di Wikipedia (https://blog.datawrapper.de/wikipedia-articles-written-by-a-bot/) dicono di utilizzare le IA per effettuare le traduzioni, che spesso risultano essere imprecise (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y) o polarizzate (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0267323120940908), introducendo termini della neolingua (https://scitechdaily.com/chatgpts-strong-left-wing-political-bias-unmasked-by-new-study/) gender. Amazon (https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/20/amazon-restricts-authors-from-self-publishing-more-than-three-books-a-day-after-ai-concerns) è stato costretto dagli utenti che mettevano sul mercato libri generati artificialmente tramite IA a limitare la pubblicazione a soli 3 libri al giorno. X (https://postwise.ai/blog/ai-tweet-generators-comparison) (Twitter (https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tutorials/how-to-create-a-twitter-bot-with-twitter-api-v2)) alla stregua degli altri social media come Facebook (https://www.socialpilot.co/facebook-post-generator), YouTube (https://vidiq.com/generate/) e TikTok (https://www.veed.io/tools/ai-video/tiktok-video-generator) dispone di automatismi a pagamento e gratuiti, ma solitamente con registrazione, che consentono di generare (https://proofed.com/knowledge-hub/what-is-ai-generated-content/) e pubblicare (https://narrato.io/blog/publishing-automation-pillar-post-how-to-speed-up-content-publishing-with-publishing-automation/) a cadenza temporale scelta un determinato tipo di contenuti anche personalizzabili. 3) LA DEAD INTERNET THEORY Presso questo (https://forum.agoraroad.com/index.php?threads/dead-internet-theory-most-of-the-internet-is-fake.3011/) forum è stata teorizzata la "Dead Internet Theory (https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2024/01/16/the-dead-internet-theory-explained/)" che sostiene che la maggior parte dei contenuti presenti su internet sia fasulla, polarizzata (https://www.agendadigitale.eu/sicurezza/privacy/la-profilazione-social-influenza-le-scelte-elettorali-come-funziona-e-quali-difese/) e manipolata. Le IA giocano un ruolo cruciale in questo processo e propagandano online contenuti attraverso una ripetizione (https://www.andreaminini.com/comunicazione/la-ripetizione-nella-comunicazione-online) meccanica e distribuita (https://meetedgar.com/blog/repeating-social-media-content/) su più canali. Quanto accade non solo influisce sulla diversità e sull'autenticità dei contenuti, ma va ad intaccare anche le scelte prese tramite mera esposizione (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia/933) e framing (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia/729), favorendo pertanto contenuti solitamente affini a quelli sostenuti dai sistemi di monetizzazione (https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-social-media-makes-us-more-polarized-and-how-to-fix-it/) e impedendo agli altri di diffondersi. Come riportato da alcuni siti web, la notizia viene presentata come una "teoria del complotto" (1 (https://en.wikiless.tiekoetter.com/wiki/Dead_Internet_theory), 2 (https://lifebonder.com/blog/2022/10/11/the-dead-internet-theory/), 3 (https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2024/02/09/internet-sta-per-morire-la-teoria-complottista-dead-internet-theory-torna-a-circolare-sui-social-ecco-perche-ha-un-fondo-di-verita/7440254/), 4 (https://brainlenses.substack.com/p/dead-internet-theory), 5 (https://www.crypto.it/2023/04/15/dead-internet-theory/)) ma i fatti dimostrano il contrario: la mole di contenuti generati artificialmente sta dilagando ovunque, dai siti web per le aziende (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361076492_User-Generated_Content_and_Consumer_Brand_Engagement), ai blog (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047287517746014), agli articoli (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2016.1189840) giornalistici (https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4962), ai social media (1 (https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2021/08/dead-internet-theory-wrong-but-feels-true/619937/), 2 (https://thedeadinternettheory.com/), 3 (https://www.theswaddle.com/what-the-dead-internet-theory-predicted-about-the-future-of-digital-life)), questo perché portano ad un risparmio economico, soprattutto per le aziende (1 (https://www.hbritalia.it/settembre-2023/2023/09/01/news/il-potenziale-economico-dellia-generativa-e-le-nuove-frontiere-della-produttivita-15641/), 2 (https://www.partitaiva.it/intelligenza-artificiale-generativa/), 3 (https://www.aiopenmind.it/ArtificialIntelligence/il-potenziale-economico-dellia-generativa-la-prossima-frontiera-della-produttivita/)). È stato dedicato anche un articolo accademico (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-023-01857-0) alla teoria dove si sostiene che l'IA non viene più usata solo per creare contenuti, ma per creare gli stessi influencer con lo scopo di rendere i giovani dipendenti da internet. Anche in Italia si diffonde questo fenomeno, con diverse influencer e "modelle" completamente virtuali (1 (https://www.castellinotizie.it/2024/04/04/in-visita-a-nemi-linfluencer-virtuale-francesca-giubelli-creata-dallintelligenza-artificiale-che-splendore-i-piccoli-borghi-del-territorio/), 2 (https://www.wired.it/article/prima-ai-influencer-italiana-rebecca-galani/), 3 (https://www.ilmattino.it/lifestyle/persone/emily_pellegrini_modella_finta_foto_oggi_4_1_2024-7851960.html), 4 (https://www.amica.it/2023/11/29/aiatana-lopez-modella-influencer-generata-intelligenza-artificiale/), 5 (https://www.wired.it/article/milla-sofia-influencer-virtuale-instagram-foto-intelligenza-artificiale/)), ma in realtà sono molti altri questi personaggi artificiali sul web che si spacciano per utenti reali. L'IA italiana "Francesca Giubelli" ha addirittura fondato un partito politico fittizio per promuovere l'intelligenza artificiale (1 (https://www.wired.it/article/francesca-giubelli-influencer-virtuale-partito/), 2 (https://roma.repubblica.it/cronaca/2024/02/16/news/francesca_giubelli_partito_alleanza_nazionale_influencer_sovranista_intelligenza_artificiale-422149870/), 3 (https://roma.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/24_febbraio_01/l-influencer-artificiale-francesca-giubelli-lancia-un-partito-politico-alleanza-italiana-promuovera-la-bellezza-italiana-nel-mondo-28a933df-dce6-4ef0-8b2f-41891f868xlk.shtml), 4 (https://ainews.it/linfluencer-creata-con-lai-lancia-un-partito-ecco-alleanza-italiana/)). CONCLUSIONI Internet sta diventando un ostacolo a se stesso e sempre più isolante, chiudendo le persone in recinti di bot che si fingono esseri umani. Iscriviti a Der Einzige 👉🏻 CLICCA QUI (https://t.me/dereinzigeitalia) 👈🏻
    Angry
    2
    0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 24K Visualizzazioni